Play our music game. See if you can find the hidden
Army marches on our site. Click the icons you find on each page. Some have music
hidden
behind them, others do not. Good luck!
Music courtesy USAREUR Band
To follow us on Twitter, click here!
Click below to LIKE us!
Click below to check out our Facebook page.
Make a difference!
It’s easy to give!
As a non-profit organization
donations to our Scholarship Fund are 100% tax-deductible.
More importantly, your donation helps children of
Signal OCS families achieve their dream of a college education.
Contributions in any amount are welcome.
Just click on the
DONATE button above to make a donation today.
Thank You!
From Our Home Page Archive
Home Page as originally published in
September 2013
— This Month —
If We Call The Russians, Will They Answer The Phone?
Bill And Art's Excellent Adventure
and...
Part 3: America Between The Wars –
Radio Begins To Crackle
- - - - -
MISSION STATEMENT
Our Association is a
not-for-profit fraternal organization. It's purpose is a) to foster
camaraderie among the graduates of Signal Corps Officer Candidate
School classes of the World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War
eras, b) to organize and offer scholarships and other assistance for
the families of Officer and Enlisted OCS cadre who are in need, and
c) to archive for posterity the stories and history of all of the
Signal Corps OCS Officers who served this great country. We are open
to ALL former Army Signal Corps OCS graduates,
their families and
friends, as well as other officers, enlisted men, those interested
in military history, and the general public.
Please, come join us. For more information about our Association, to
see a list of our Officers and Directors, or for contact details,
click on the OCS Association link at left.
Please note: The
views and opinions expressed on this website are offered in order to
stimulate interest in those who visit it. They are solely the views
and expressions of the authors and/or contributors to this website
and do not necessarily represent the views of the Army Signal Corps
Officer Candidate School Association, its Officers, Directors,
members, volunteers, staff, or any other party associated with the
Association.
If you have any suggestions for improvements to this site, please
send them to
WebMaster@ArmySignalOCS.com. We are here to serve you.
If We Call The Russians, Will They Answer The Phone?
– or –
Why Your Wife No Longer Answers The Phone After Your Starter
Marriage Ended
The humor in this article is that of the author's, not
the Army Signal Corps Officer Candidate School Association
its Officers or its Directors. It's humor
folks...maybe bad humor, but still humor. It's not political comment. Don't get yourself all
worked up over it. Please.
It seems as though President Obama’s relationship with
Premier Putin has ended, and his famous effort to push the
reset button has come to an embarrassing and very public
ending. In American office business slang their relationship
would be classified as a starter marriage. I.e. a
short-lived affair/marriage that ends in divorce, with the
wrong side getting the kids, all the property, and the other
suffering the regrets. Can you guess which side got the
property and kids, and which got the regrets?
In our humble opinion (or more properly these days, IOHO)
Putin got the better of this deal, while Obama went home
licking his wounds and vowing to find a better marriage
partner next time.
Don't
believe us? Look at the property settlement: Putin got Obama
to walk away from Poland and the rest of Eastern Europe and
forget about his idea of putting defensive missiles in the
neighborhood. And how about the kids? As we read it, the
settlement says Putin gets to keep the ugly step child...
Edward Snowden... who Obama desperately wanted.
So with the demise of this once fascinating relationship,
one wonders, if America calls, will Russia answer?
Probably not… since it doesn't appear that President Putin
cares a whit about his former spouse, what he thinks, or what
he wants... which brings us to the subject of this story:
communication links between America and Russia... or more
specifically, the famous Washington–Moscow
Hotline. Perhaps it’s time to dust off this edifice and
crank the handle, just to make sure the ball still drops on
the other end. We may need to use it sooner than we think.
As most know, the famous Hotline came into being in
response to the Cuban missile crisis of October, 1962.
Recognizing that there was some value in being able to talk
directly with each other in the event of a situation where
clarity of purpose and intent was critical, both sides
signed a Memorandum of Understanding in June, 1963, in
Geneva, to set up a duplex cable circuit routed from
Washington through London, Copenhagen, Stockholm, on to
Helsinki, and then to Moscow. This circuit was to be used
for primary political communications, and was buttressed
with a duplex radio circuit that went directly from
Washington to Tangier and then from there on to Moscow.
In popular culture ever since that time this Hotline was
thought of as being something of a Red Phone that sat on the
President’s desk... waiting to be used or answered. The
truth was there was no such phone involved. Instead, the
circuit was set up as a teletype connection. Later,
in 1988,
the teletypes were replaced with fax units. In more modern
times (since 2008) the Hotline has relied on a secure
computer link over which messages are exchanged by eMail.
Which brings up another matter.... it almost makes one
wonder, is the NSA collecting the meta data on these eMails
too? No… that would be absurd, wouldn’t it... or would it?
For those that are curious, the actual time line for the
provisioning and use of the Washington–Moscow Hotline looks
something like
this:
1963:
Establishment of a land line teletype link between the
Kremlin and the Pentagon
1967: Ancillary terminal
installed at the White House.
1971: The hotline gets its
first usage, when the two sides decide to talk about each
other’s intentions with regard to the newly started war
between India and Pakistan.
1971: The India-Pakistan
issue causes both sides to realize that the system needed to
be upgraded. Based on an agreement signed almost
immediately [read the full text here:
Washington–Moscow Hotline Link Agreement - 1971] the
system was modernized. Work began right away, but took until
1978 to be completed. Upgrades included linking two American
Intelsat satellites with two Soviet Molniya II satellites
(which strangely followed a highly elliptical orbit) in
order to create a set of primary connections between
Washington and Moscow. The U.S. provided one circuit via the
Intelsat system, and the Soviets the other via their Molniya
II system. Multiple terminals were installed in each
country. As backup, the original teletype circuits were left
in place, but the Washington-Tangier-Moscow radio circuit
was terminated.
1973: More use... this time
over the Yom Kippur war.
1974: …and again, over the
Turkish invasion of Cyprus.
1978: The circuitous land
line the system depended on was finally fully replaced by
the satellite link started in 1971.
1977: President Jimmy Carter
decides to use the Hotline to send a personal message to
Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev. Brezhnev thought the gesture
immature and fired back that the Russians didn't appreciate
use of such an important communication device for personal
purposes. There doesn’t appear to be any record of Carter’s
response to his hand being slapped by Brezhnev.
1979: While proving futile,
the hotline was used by the U.S. to find out Russia’s
intentions in invading Afghanistan. Considering Brezhnev’s
response to the friendly folksy way Carter liked to operate
(see 1977, above), it was clear that they saw no need to let
the U.S. know what they were thinking, unless it was in the
way of a scowl exposed across teeth hidden by scorn.
1980: While still useful and
fully operational, the old teletype and encryption machines
then being used were replaced by newer ones.
Part 3 - America Between The Wars
Over the past few months we have been
looking at the state of the American military between World
War I and World War II. Our interest has been in how the
military went from being essentially a 19th century one to a
20th century one, and the best in the world at that. What we
found was that much of the improvements came about because
of the actions of the U.S. Army Signal Corps. Nearly single
handedly, the Signal Corps put into effect a series of
actions that pushed not only the military but American
business to a higher level of effectiveness and productivity
than had even been attained before.
Included in those activities was the
development of newer and more modern methods of research,
design and manufacturing, as well as better methods for
quality control, the standardization of systems, tests,
measurements, production and much more. New laboratories
were set up, new partnerships were built with academia, new
training programs were established, new methods for
logistics control were developed, and even an early forms of
just in time (JIT) inventory control was defined and tried
as means to assure that whatever turned out to be needed
on the front lines in the next war, it would be there when
needed... in the proper quantity, and working. The changes
the Signal Corps made to how American industry operated were
revolutionary, and could easily be cited as the root cause
that made America the superpower it is today.
Last month we focused on one
technological area to show how such revolution could come to
even the most mundane of technologies. The area we focused
on was the use of wire as a primary means of communication.
This month we will look at what the Signal Corps did in the
then emerging field of radio.
Radio Begins To Crackle
While wire was at that time the
primary means of communication, in part it held its
dominance because it offered a cheap, easy and reliable
means for establishing field communication in war time. This
was especially so in rear-areas, where much of the
administrative work was done. As the battle space got closer
to the front however, advances in forms of combat were
beginning to test the limits of wire based communication
systems, especially when it came to the issue of ease of
installation and the reliability of the communication
channels that were set up.
In particular, the use of what was
called light assault wire tended to limit the number of
circuits that could be put in place, while the methods for
laying this wire left it exposed to being destroyed by
everything from tanks to bombing runs. Because of this, in
that area where divisional wire networks and light assault
wire networks met and ran towards the front, a new solution
was needed. Further, two new combat doctrines were being
developed at that time that would put additional pressure on
the effectiveness of wire based communications. The first
dealt with mechanization of the fighting force, while the
second sought to increase its mobility. Both promised to
propel troops out of reach of the rear echelon wire networks
almost as soon as they were up and running.
The obvious answer to this problem was
radio, as it promised to be able to keep up with troop
movements no matter where they were… or at least that was
the hope. Otherwise, a solution was going to have to be
developed that created a link between the men at the back
where the fixed equipment was located and the men at the
front using the sound-powered telephone networks held
together with the lightest wire in use.
Sitting here today it is easy to think
that radio was obviously the only choice needed, and that it
must have soon displaced wire communication nets. But that
wasn’t the case. When radios were tried they were proven to
have severe limitations that, until technology could be
pushed along by the Signal Corps, would threaten the
effectiveness of the dual doctrines of mechanization and
mobility.
Instead, the answer fell to finding a
way to marry the two technologies so that the limitations of
radio as a means of communication were buttressed by a
combination of spiral-four cable and radio relays. Radio
communication, by voice, was thus slow to find its way onto
the battlefield; although wherever it did find a way to fit
into the forward echelon areas it quickly became the
dominant tactical communication method, displacing
telegraphy and wire telephone almost completely.
This page last updated 1 September 2013.
New content is constantly being added. Please check back
frequently.
Posted 1 September 2013
–The Center for
Cryptologic History will host its biennial international symposium in
October. All Signal Corps personnel are invited... active, retired, or
whatever. Click here for more information.
Posted 1 August 2013
–Thinking about a second home? Maybe a cottage
somewhere? Perhaps
something up in the mountains so that you can do a little
hunting or fishing? Colorado, maybe? Or how about a place
along the coast... the beautiful Tidewater area of South Carolina,
say? Then check out our list of Signal OCS members that run
their own real estate companies. They'll be sure to treat
you right. Talk to
David Martinek, Class 09-67, or
Jimmy Stewart, Class 17-52. They'll both help you
find what you need. You can find them on our
Other Links
page, or just click their names above.
Posted 1 August 2013
– Have a business of
your own? Drop us a note with the details and we'll post your business on
our Other Links page. And don't forget, you can advertise your business in
our OCS Newsletter. Just send an eMail to Preas Street at
preasstr@csranet.com for details.
Posted 1 August 2013
–The
Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Society
has extended a special invitation to all former Army Signal Corps
OCS graduates and Officers to join them
for the presentation of the William J. Donovan Award to
Admiral William H. McRaven USN, Commander, U.S. Special Operations
Command (USSOCOM), in Washington, DC, on October 26, 2013.
In addition to honoring Admiral McRaven, the Society will
also honor veterans of OSS and members of its successor
organizations: the Central Intelligence Agency and USSOCOM.
A special musical tribute to Hollywood legend Marlene
Dietrich will also be presented. Ms. Dietrich served the OSS
by recording songs that were used by its Morale Operations
Branch. Maria Riva, Marlene Dietrich's daughter, will offer
a toast to her mother.
At the dinner the Society will also commemorate the
liberation of the Hotel Ritz in Paris in 1944 by Ernest
Hemingway, Col. David Bruce, and members of the French
Resistance. When they arrived at the Hotel Ritz shortly
after the Nazis had fled the hotel, the manager asked
Hemingway if there was anything he could do for them.
Hemingway said: "How about 75 dry martinis?" Colin Field,
the head bartender at the Hotel Ritz and founder of its
legendary Hemingway Bar, will offer a toast to Ambassador
Bruce, Hemingway, and his son, John Hemingway, who served as
an OSS Jedburgh (the predecessors to U.S. Army Special
Forces) and parachuted behind Nazi lines into France.
(Marlene Dietrich and Ernest Hemingway met while crossing
the Atlantic in 1934 and remained close friends until the
author's death in 1961.) Seating space is limited; those interested in attending this
special function should contact the OSS directly at: The OSS
Society, Inc., 703-356-6667
oss@osssociety.org .
Continued from left column...
What were the limitations that kept voice radio from
“fitting the bill”? On the one hand, its size and weight was
not conducive to use in a fluid and rapidly moving combat
situation. The equipment was large, bulky and heavy. Sets
were designated as being "two-man portables," but often
enough this proved not to be the case with the equipment
simply having to be moved by either horse or truck, until it
was where it was needed, after which it then had to be
removed from the vehicle (or animal) and set up.
Then there was the limitation of technology, in terms of the
designs of those days not leading to entirely reliable
communication links. Most of the early military radios
worked on the basis of either a tone or continuous wave
signal being sent, generally in the middle and/or high
frequencies range. Back in the Signal Corps’ research labs
development had moved beyond this, but the equipment in the
hands of the troops themselves was from an earlier era,
several years behind research being conducted at Monmouth.
Add to this a hand-cranked generator to make the thing work,
a small loop antenna with limited range, and manual tuning,
and a soldier was lucky if he could find and talk to anyone
at all.
So
while voice radio communication did find its way into the
battle space, until more progress could be made the Signal
Corps subordinated its use to that of the wire systems that
it knew worked well and were reliable. After all, when
people are in combat having communication, no matter how old
or rudimentary, is better than having none. As far as the
late 30s Signal Corps was concerned radios had a purpose,
and a place, but that place was not yet with the shifting
front line. Instead, it tended to be as a supplemental form
of communication for Artillery batteries, Infantry Division
HQ work, or with the new flight based interceptor squadrons
that were coming online as the Signal Corps’ other step
child grew: the fledgling Army Air Corps. With this in mind,
the Signal Corps helped outline a concept for warfare that
used radio communication where it could, but left the main
heavy lifting to be done by tried-and-true wireline systems.
Yet while the Signal Corps was relegating radio
communication to the back burner, in no way should this
suggest that research and development on better radio
systems was being set aside, nor that the radio equipment
that did make it into the field was either obsolete or
technically unreliable. While perhaps somewhat behind the
times in terms of being the latest in advanced
radio technology, the systems put into use worked, were well
designed, and representative of those radio systems in
common use during those days. Even so, it was not until much
later... towards the end of the 1930s and into the early
1940s... that Signal Corps research improvements began to
result in systems that truly outperformed these early radio
systems.
Bill & Art's Excellent Adventure
We spend so much time talking about militaria, politics and
other serious things on this website that we thought that
this month we would give you a break. Knowing that every
good American has tattooed a Harley symbol on his arm (or in
the usual Tramp Stamp position for you women who are reading
our website), we thought we would take a break from the
normal Army Signal Corps stuff and fill you in on a little
of Harley Davidson’s history. And so... Bill & Art's
Excellent Adventure.
This year Sturgis ran from August 5 to 11. We looked around
(while we could still focus…), but didn’t see anyone wearing
signal flags on their collars. I guess that means we were
the only one there wearing ours.
No? Well in that case, look for us next year… we’ll be the
one on the Iron 883 with the Signal Corps emblem on the
tail, proudly wearing our flags on our collar. At any rate, if you are a Harley
lover like we are, we want you to know the following... or
put another way, herewith we present to you our unofficial
Army Signal Corps
version of the Harley Davidson
story. Enjoy.
• ●
•
In 1901 a then 22 year old named
Bill Harley designed a single engine motor he believed he
could attach to a bicycle frame, and thus make it possible
to go places without having to pedal. Two years later, with
his friend Art Davidson, they produced their first riding
bike, which they called a “power-cycle.” The first thing
they noticed however was that while trying to ride it up and
down the hills in their backyard it didn’t have the power
to get where they wanted to go. Fortunately they had left
the pedals on and so they were able to pedal to where they were headed,
but the point sank in... they recognized that while the
thing had some value, the whole idea of a machine that
didn’t need pedal power still alluded them.
Over the next few years they played
with their idea until in 1903 they felt good enough about
their progress to form a company to produce the power-cycle.
And thus it happened, in 1903 three… count them… three
motorcycles, were produced.
These units had a bigger motor than
the one that could barely get the bike up the hill, as well
as a stronger loop-frame able to support the engine. And
while terminology at the time was sketchy and somewhat
nondescript, the redesign Bill and Art did boosted their
bike out of the “motorized bicycle” class and into the a
class then becoming known as the “motorcycle” class.
By 1905 the boys had sold 8 bikes.
Wow, 8 bikes sold by the age of 26!
But that was just the beginning. The
next year 50 more were sold… and Bill and Art's excellent
adventure had begun.
Bill and Art, or the “Harley Boys” as
we prefer to think of them, were more than just mechanics… they were also pretty darn good at marketing for
their time. One thing they did was to spruce up their bikes
to make them look good. Just like the pin-stripers of the
early 50’s that made street rods a thing of beauty, the
Harley Boys recognized that while their bikes might get
attention if they sounded mean when arriving somewhere, they
would get more attention sitting there if they looked good.
And so they set out to make sure their motorcycles stood out
in any crowd they drove into.
In particular, they painted their bikes a
solid, very, very shiny black, after which they both picked
up paint brushes and set about hand-painting on each bike
a series of pinstripes… and… most important of all… the
much revered “Harley-Davidson Motor Company” logo... which
they placed conspicuously on the
fuel tank.
Imagine… pin-stripes in the early
1900s... the mind boggles.
Is The Solution To PTSD Just Around The Corner?
Researchers at California Polytechnic State University are
busy working to create and implement technologies that will
give soldiers “mutant powers.” Some feel this is good,
because it will allow the military to replace “normal”
soldiers in the field with “mutants” who are immune to the
dangers they face… dangers like chemical warfare, polluted
air, irradiated battlefields, or even the onset of
PTSD. Others say this research must stop. They say that the
prospect of super-humans with enhanced strength, endurance,
superior cognition and a lack of fear could do more harm
than good.
To
understand where this fear comes from, one needs to
understand that these enhanced soldiers will not be cyborgs
like the one in our picture here, but real people whose
capabilities have been enhanced by drugs, special nutrition,
electro-shock, gene therapy, robotic implants and more. The
military and CalPoly’s researchers are asking, if ball
players can enhance their capabilities through drugs, why
can’t soldiers? If gene therapy for the purpose of playing
sports and making hundreds of millions a year is acceptable,
then why is it not so for the purpose of defending your
country?
We won’t take a position here, but we think you should keep
your eye on this issue. Those who are against this form of
military weapon development say that the result of tampering
with humanity are only dimly understood. Those in the know
say it’s too late… the genie’s already out of the bottle:
the benefits are too irresistible and the
military-industrial complex is simply going to bring it
about.
If that’s the case, the best we may be able to do now is
work to develop policies to prepare for and control the use
of these new technologies… rather than wait until they are
already in use, like the drones circling over our cities.
Keep your eye on this… who knows, the next enemy you see
coming through the fence may look like our man above.
My Game
In our article above we used the
issue of drugs in baseball to argue that if it can be done
there, then why not for the purpose of creating
super-soldiers? Here we ask you to listen to Babe Ruths’
farewell address. For the moment let’s leave aside the
issue of super-soldiers and return to the issue of
enhancement drugs being used in sports… and baseball in
particular.
For my part, the constant
drip, drip, drip of stories about sports figures using drugs
to enhance their performance is beginning to make me
insensitive to the
problem. After all, when you hear it occurring for the 400th
or 500th time you start thinking “maybe it ain’t no big
deal?” And then you hear something like the recording above…
where in his own words the Bambino talks about what baseball
is and what it should be… and once again you realize that drugs in
sports is simply wrong.
I don’t care about the people who use
these drugs. If they want to do so, let them. I also could
care less how much damage the drugs do to their body as they
age, or how much money they make from taking them. But I do
care about what the practice of sports figures taking drugs
is doing to the integrity of a sport that is not only
uniquely American, but is MY sport, and YOURS too. It’s the
sport we played when we grew up, and it should stay as pure
in the major leagues as it was on the grass fields and sandlots
you and I played on.
When I was 7 years old and George
Clark and I and a few other neighborhood kids met in the
field behind Ginny Lesley’s house to play baseball, it
didn’t trouble me that George would end up out hitting me,
out running me and out pitching me in the game. It didn't
bother me because I knew he was bigger, stronger and faster
than me. That’s just the way it was. He was bigger and
faster than me, and so would always beat me. But that
didn’t stop me from playing the game. I played the game
because it was not only fun, but because it was not fixed…it
was pure… and so if I and my team played our best we could
still win, regardless of how strong Pidge (our nickname for
him) was.
When I was a kid playing baseball the
game was pure. As I grew up the games I watched on TV were
pure. When I got to college I had a chance to play an
intercollegiate game on the old
Boston Braves field (then
owned by Boston University and called Nickerson Field), and
it was pure. And it was because of that purity that when I
stood at home plate, in the same spot Babe Ruth had stood,
and looked out at the fence… which seemed a million miles
away... I felt in awe of the man and how good he must have
been. How was it possible that Babe Ruth could hit homers
over that fence? How was that
possible?
Today I know the answer. It was
because like George Clark he was bigger and better than
those he played against… and that bigness and betterness
came to him not through drugs but through hard work. And
because he worked hard to get better the game he played…
baseball… a game that belongs to YOU and I… stayed pure.
Babe Ruth didn’t take drugs,
Ted Williams didn’t,
Sandy Koufax didn’t, nor any of my other heroes of those
days. These guys weren’t angels... not by a long shot... but
they were honest men. The rot that play major
league baseball today and take drugs to improve their game
are not honest men. They are cheats. They have no integrity
and should be banned from the game for life.
September's Crossword Puzzle
Theme:
Harley Davidson Terminology
Hint:
Join 2 and 3 word answers together as one complete word.
For
answer key to this month's puzzle,
see icon at bottom of page
Search Instructions:
To perform a
quick search for a VIETNAM, KOREA or WWII era class (such
as: 7-66),
a graduate (such as: Green), or a site search, follow
this example:
A search, for example, for Richard
Green, will result in all the "Richard" entries,
all the "Green" entries, and all the "Richard Green"
entries.
Original Site Design and Construction
By John Hart, Class 07-66. Ongoing site design and
maintenance courtesy Class 09-67.
Content and design Copyright 1998 -
2013, ArmySignalOCS.com
This site is updated as we
receive new material. Please check back frequently. For your
security, please read our Website Privacy & Use Policy by
clickinghere.